Copyright 2012 Isaac M Stone

One man's journey through the labyrinth of medical billing

This is a true story

The names have been changed or redacted

and other obfuscations have been used

to confuse the lawyers

THIS COULD HAPPEN TO YOU !

A Visit to the Local ER

Ira is a 64 year old male in good health. He's never smoked and maintains his normal high school weight. He has no medical problems and takes no medicines. His only past medical history is a kidney stone 30 years ago. That stone passed on its own without problem.

At 9 a.m. on December 10, Ira was awakened by severe abdominal pain. It started in his right flank and radiated to his right groin. When he started vomiting, his wife took him to a local ER.

Over several hours he was seen by multiple providers. These included nurses, a physician's assistant (PA), a general surgeon, a urologist, and a hospitalist.  Blood, urine, and CAT scan testing were done. By 2:30 p.m. the diagnosis was clear - Acute Ureteral Colic (recurrent kidney stone). He was then transferred to the CDU (Clinical Decision Unit). Some time during all this he spontaneously passed the stone.

The Standard of Care for kidney stones is straight forward:

FOUR of these critical steps were neglected. Thus, his care did not meet the Standard per an expert in the field. Ira was in the facility a total of 24 hours. He did not have surgery. He did not require admission. Yet, the hospital and its providers later presented bills totaling about $16,000.

Ira feels that these charges are arbitrary and excessive.  This is the equivalent of 130% of his annual social security income, a year's college tuition, a new car.

This is Ira's story

The Event

 A Walk-Through of the Patient's Encounter with the ER

Analysis

A Review of the Results by an ER Physician

Hospital Bills

 A Detailed Description of the Charges and Services Provided

Doctors' Bills

 All of the Doctors Billed Separately - Sort of a la carte

Communication with hospital

 Who Speaks for the Hospital ?

Price Transparency

What You Don't See is What You Get

The Promise and the Reality of Fair and Open Pricing

Collections

 "Show Me the Money"

Patient Bill of Rights

 The People Who Dealt with Ira Had No Idea

References

Conclusion

This hospital does a lot of advertising about quality of service.  Its image is always clean and polished.  But never do they mention that if one avails oneself of these services, one may very well be bankrupted by the bills.  The shock, the intimidation, the overwhelming sense of being chased by a juggernaut can cause more damage to one's health than the reason for the visit.  "First, do no harm." apparently, does not apply to bill collection.

During both the visit and the following Communication with hospital , Ira felt as if he was dealing with a basketball team without a coach.  Ira was the ball.  He was constantly being handed off to the next player with little or no oversight or plan.  Nurse to PA to surgeon to urologist to CT scan technician to waiting room to second bed to hospitalist to extended stay room to other nurse to other hospitalist.  An assembly line of talent.  There was no discussion of diagnosis or treatment with the patient.  No one was in charge of the case.  There were similar handoffs in the billing.  No single individual with which to discuss issues.  Billing to customer service to various physicians for questions to financial counselor to auditor back to customer service to medical records to billing.  Distributed deniability.  No followup.

The client has a right to expect that charges for service are fair and reasonable.  What rational human being can look at these prices and call them fair or reasonable?  The Flomax charge was 10 times its cost.  The CT scan charge was 100 times the cost.

How valuable is a CT scan and radiologist report that mentions neither the appendix nor the ureters? Both of which are important for a diagnosis.

If an ER physician is not "hands on" for a Level V emergency, then when is he needed?

Premium price.  Premium service?

The Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, which licenses hospitals, advised that there is no patient advocate in the state government to intercede for people who feel that they have been overcharged or that the bills are excessive.  There are no pricing controls on hospitals.  They are free to charge anything for any service they provide.  Most hospitals have case workers that can review bills and negotiate settlements, but there are no rules requiring them.  The charges are considered valid by default.  When a hospital does not have a case worker or an arbitration policy, what remains?  It is left to each victim to fight his own battle against a powerful and experienced foe; to use whatever legal means are available.  Until the politicians get the message that this problem must be fixed or a legal class action is brought and won or enough people do what Ira did, we will have a hospital system whose pricing policy lacks transparency, competition and government oversight.